Which is better for finance jobs in the USA: a STEM MFin or an MBA in Finance?

Question

Divakshi Arora · Accepted Answer

Choosing between a STEM MFin and an MBA in Finance depends on the type of finance job someone wants in the US. A STEM MFin is usually better for early-career roles in analytics, quant finance, markets, and investment banking analyst positions because the curriculum is more technical and the three-year OPT makes hiring easier.
An MBA in Finance works better for applicants with experience who want mid-level or leadership-track roles. Salary growth is strong for both, but MBA graduates often start at a higher level because they enter at the associate tier rather than the analyst tier. For someone early in their career and targeting technical finance, the STEM MFin tends to be the more direct path.

S Raghav · Answer

A lot of students compare these two, but the better choice depends on job level and how US employers view each degree.
&bull; A STEM MFin fits students aiming for analyst roles in IB, quant, trading, or data-heavy finance since the coursework matches those skills closely. &bull; An MBA in Finance is preferred for candidates with work experience who want associate-level or managerial roles. &bull; The STEM MFin offers a full 36-month OPT window, which helps with hiring in technical roles where companies value longer work authorization. &bull; Employers in the US generally treat MBA graduates as more prepared for leadership tracks, while MFin graduates are hired into technical or analytical positions.
For students targeting technical finance, a STEM MFin works better. For career switchers or people aiming at bigger roles, the MBA is stronger.
For more details you can read this blog on  "STEM MFin Programs in USA"