Is MIT Master of Finance worth it if I already have internships and CFA Level 1, or should I work for a few years and do an MBA instead?

I’ve done two internships — one in equity research and another in corporate finance — and I’ve also cleared CFA Level 1. I’m now trying to decide between doing a Master of Finance (MFin) right after graduation or working for 2–3 years and then going for an MBA. My long-term goal is to work in investment banking or asset management, ideally in a global role. I’m wondering if doing an MFin now will help me break into these roles earlier, or if it’s better to gain some experience and apply for an MBA later for broader leadership positions. I’d really appreciate input on ROI, career progression, and how employers view these two paths — especially if you already have CFA and some relevant internships.
Read more

Asked by Karthik Iyer 8 months ago

Mohit C

Mohit C

Business analyst

 An MBA after work experience can sometimes offer more flexibility and higher long-term pay than an MFin right away.

With 2–3 years of experience before an MBA:
 • Post-MBA roles in investment banking, private equity, or hedge fund management often start at $150K–$175K base, with total comp exceeding $300K in strong bonus years.
 • Candidates can also step into senior roles in corporate treasury or mergers & acquisitions at Fortune 500 companies.
 • The work background helps secure leadership-track positions rather than purely technical roles.
 • An MBA network provides access to finance-adjacent sectors like fintech leadership or sovereign wealth fund roles.
 • Starting later allows more clarity on which finance niche offers the best career growth before committing fully.

For more details you can read this blog on "MIT MFin"

upvote icon
Upvote•9
Comment
0
Share