In the example explained during the video about the farmers conclusion for the improved yield, there were 3 assumptions mentioned. Please explain how to identify the primary assumption of the 3?

Question

I can eliminate the first one as it was not as relevant as the other 2 for the conclusion, however, I am confused between the last 2.

Kriti Solanki · Accepted Answer

To find the main assumption in the farmer's argument, we need to figure out what the argument depends on for it to make sense. Here's a simple breakdown:
Argument Summary- Fact: Most of our food energy comes from rice, wheat, and corn.- Fact: To feed everyone as the population grows, we need to get more food from each acre of these crops every year.Therefore, the government should spend more money on research to find new ways to increase crop yields.Possible Assumptions- We can find new ways to increase yields through research.- Spending more money on research will actually lead to finding these new ways.- The only way to keep up with population growth is by increasing crop yields.How to find the Primary AssumptionTo decide which assumption is most important, let's think about what the conclusion relies on the most.
- If we can't find new ways to increase yields, then spending money on research would be pointless. So, the argument depends heavily on the idea that it's possible to find new ways to improve yields through research.- If spending more money doesn't lead to new ways to improve yields, then the recommendation to increase funding doesn't help. This is important but less critical than the first assumption because it depends on the possibility of new discoveries.- If there are other ways to feed people (like reducing waste or changing diets), then focusing only on crop yields might not be necessary. This assumption is about the strategy but isn't as directly tied to the conclusion as the first two.ConclusionThe main assumption is that it is possible to find new ways to improve yields through research. Without this, the argument for spending more money on research wouldn't make sense at all. The other assumptions are important but build on this primary idea.I hope this helps :)

In the example explained during the video about the farmer's conclusion for the improved yield, there were 3 assumptions mentioned. Please explain how to identify the primary assumption of the 3?